Demonstrating the Hallmarks of Gynecologic Malignancies by Translating Radiation Therapy Theory to Clinical Practice: A Student and Mentor Perspective.

A radiation therapist (RTT) is a key member of the radiation oncology team responsible for delivering radiation and providing direct patient care to individuals undergoing cancer treatment. Stony Brook University's School of Health Professions, in collaboration with Mount Sinai Health System's Department of Radiation Oncology, offers a unique RTT Program structure: a 4-year baccalaureate degree followed by a 12-month clinical non-credit, non-degree certificate. The RTT Program embeds concepts such as the theory of gynecologic malignancies, introduced in the didactic setting and mastered in the clinical environment. The program assigns credentialed RTTs, referred to as "RTT mentors" to students upon acceptance to the program. These mentors offer additional support to students by translating theoretical and practical aspects of the curriculum and guiding students through their academic and clinical education. This article aims to demonstrate how the hallmarks of gynecologic malignancies are integrated into radiation therapy education, from both the student's and mentor's perspectives, and across the didactic and clinical setting.

Enhancing quality assurance in radiotherapy for gynaecological cancers: implementation of an on-demand peer review process.

OBJECTIVES: Ensuring high-quality radiotherapy requires peer-reviewing target volumes. The Royal College of Radiologists recommends peer review specifically for individual target volumes in cases of gynaecological cancers. This study presents the outcomes of implementing an on-demand peer review system for gynaecological cancers within our institute. METHODS: The peer review process was planned for gynaecological cancer cases intended for curative radiotherapy. After junior clinical oncologists (COs) completed the segmentation, two senior COs specializing in gynaecological cancers conducted the peer review. All peer review outcomes were recorded prospectively. The audit process compliance, the proportion of patients requiring major and minor modifications in target volumes, the direction of changes, and the factors influencing these changes were reported. RESULTS: A total of 230 patients were eligible, and out of these, 204 (88.3%) patients underwent at least one peer review. Among the patients, 108 required major modifications in their target volumes. P-charts revealed a stabilization in the need for major modifications at the end of three months, indicating that 38.2% and 28% of patients still required major modifications for the nodal and primary CTV, respectively. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that major modifications were associated with the use of extended field radiotherapy and radical radiation in non-cervical primary cases. CONCLUSIONS: An on-demand peer review system was feasible and resulted in clinically meaningful, major modifications in the target volumes for 53% of patients. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Gynaecological cancers require ongoing peer review to ensure quality of care in radiotherapy. A flexible on-demand system not only ensures that patient treatment start is not delayed but also has an important educational role for junior trainees.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases arising from gynecological malignancies: A retrospective treatment outcome analysis.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aims to assess the efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of brain metastases (BM) originating from gynecological cancers. It focuses on local control (LC), distant tumor control (DTC), and overall survival (OS). METHODS: The analysis comprised 18 individuals with gynecological-origin BM treated with SRS at the Hadassah Medical Center from 2004 to 2021. Statistical analyses evaluate factors impacting LC, DTC, and OS. RESULTS: A total of 36 BM of gynecological origin underwent SRS. The median age at the first SRS treatment was 60 years, with a median time of 24.5 months from the primary malignancy diagnosis to BM detection. The 12-month LC rate per patient was 84.6 %, and 5.6 % per BM. Only two instances of local recurrence were observed. The DTC at 12 months was 75 %, with a 29 % overall. Non-significant trends indicating a correlation with distant brain failure with increased cumulative volume and the occurrence of craniotomy before SRS. The median OS of the cohort was 16.5 months from SRS treatment. The 6, 12, 18, and 24-month survival rates were 77.8 %, 66.7 %, 50 %, and 22.2 % respectively. Higher number of BM was associated with lower OS (p = 0.046). On multivariate analysis, age was a significant factor for OS (p = 0.03), demonstrating that older age was associated with a more favorable prognosis. CONCLUSION: This study supports SRS effectiveness for treating BM from gynecological cancers and suggests similar outcomes to more common malignancies.

Procedural interventions for oligoprogression during treatment with immune checkpoint blockade in gynecologic malignancies: a case series.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of performing procedural interventions, defined as surgical resection, tumor ablation, or targeted radiation therapy, for oligoprogressive disease among patients with gynecologic malignancies who are treated with immune checkpoint blockade. METHODS: Patients with gynecologic cancers treated with immune checkpoint blockade between January 2013 and October 2021 who underwent procedural interventions including surgical resection, interventional radiology ablation, or radiation therapy for oligoprogressive disease were identified. Procedures performed before immune checkpoint therapy initiation or ≥6 months after therapy completion were excluded. Long immunotherapy duration prior to intervention was defined as ≥6 months. Progression-free survival and overall survival were calculated from procedure date until disease progression or death, respectively. RESULTS: During the study period, 886 patients met inclusion criteria and received immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Of these, 34 patients underwent procedural interventions for oligoprogressive disease; 7 underwent surgical resection, 3 underwent interventional radiology ablation, and 24 underwent radiation therapy interventions. Primary disease sites included uterus (71%), ovary (24%), and cervix (6%). Sites of oligoprogression included abdomen/pelvis (26%), bone (21%), lung (18%), distant lymph node (18%), brain (9%), liver (6%), and vagina (3%). Most tumors (76%) did not exhibit microsatellite instability or mismatch repair deficiency. Approximately half (53%) of the patients had long immune checkpoint therapy duration prior to intervention. Median progression-free survival following the procedure was 5.3 months (95% CI, 3.1-9.9), and median overall survival was 21.7 months (95% CI, 14.9-not estimable). Long versus short immune checkpoint therapy duration prior to procedure and length of immune checkpoint therapy had no effect on progression-free or overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Procedural interventions for patients with oligoprogression on immune checkpoint blockade therapy are feasible and demonstrate favorable outcomes. With expanding use of immune checkpoint therapy, it is important to investigate combined modalities to maximize therapeutic benefit for patients with gynecologic cancers.

Redefining sexual health after gynaecological cancer: Lived experiences from Gynea, a digital rehabilitation programme.

BACKGROUND: Gynaecological cancer illness and treatment have a significant impact on women's sexual health and concerns regarding sexual health are known to be an unmet need in survivors. The digital support programme Gynea was designed to enhance women's health, including sexual health, after gynaecological cancer treatment. This study aimed to explore how cancer survivors experienced participation in Gynea. METHODOLOGY: This is a phenomenological hermeneutic study. Individual, in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore lived experiences. Twenty women were interviewed after completing the Gynea programme. The transcripts were analysed using Lindseth and Norberg's phenomenological hermeneutic method. FINDINGS: Three main themes (with subthemes) emerged from the analysis: (1) A silent existential trauma; (2) Redefining sexual health; (3) Communicating with a partner about sexuality. The women redefined sexual health rather than just being sexual intercourse, being a rediscovery of the body. The women's increased awareness and understanding of their own sexual health empowered their communication about their sexuality with their partners. This was important for regaining sexual health and intimacy in their relationships. CONCLUSION: Participation in Gynea helped to strengthen the women's sexual integrity. Knowledge and support empowered them to take care of their sexual needs and communicate these with their partners. IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: Healthcare services and nurses need to be aware that sexual health is an existential state of being, in which good sexual health does not necessarily equate to sexual function, but rather to sexual empowerment. Digital support with nurse guidance can support women in caring for their sexual health after cancer illness by thematizing sexual health with a holistic approach and should be part of the medical treatment. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Twenty gynaecological cancer survivors contributed by sharing their experiences from the sexual health module in Gynea.

Online Adaptive Magnetic Resonance-guided Radiation Therapy for Gynaecological Cancers: Preliminary Results of Feasibility and Outcome.

AIMS: To present the preliminary results on the clinical utilisation of an online daily adaptive magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) for various gynaecological cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve patients treated between September 2018 and June 2022 were included. Six patients (50%) were treated with pelvic radiation therapy followed by MRgRT boost as brachytherapy boost was ineligible or unavailable, three patients (25%) were treated with pelvic MRgRT followed by high dose rate brachytherapy, two patients (16.7%) were treated with only MRgRT, one patient (8.3%) was treated with linear accelerator-based radiation therapy followed by MRgRT boost for bulky iliac lymph nodes. RESULTS: The median age was 56.5 years (range 31-86 years). Eight patients (66.7%) had a complete response, three patients (25%) had a partial response and one patient (8.3%) died due to acute renal failure. The mean follow-up time was 11.2 months (range 3.1-42.6 months). The estimated 1-year overall survival was 88.9%. The median treatment time was 47 days (range 10-87 days). During external beam radiation therapy, 10 (83.3%) patients had concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Pelvic external beam radiation therapy doses for all cohorts were 45-50.4 Gy with a fraction dose of 1.8 Gy. The median magnetic resonance-guided boost dose was 32 Gy (range 20-50 Gy) and fraction doses ranged between 4 and 10 Gy. Three patients were treated with intracavitary high dose rate brachytherapy (26-28 Gy in four to five fractions). None of the patients had grade >3 late genitourinary toxicities. CONCLUSION: MRgRT is reliable and clinically feasible for treating patients with gynaecological cancers alone or in combination with brachytherapy with an acceptable toxicity and outcome. MRgRT boost could be an option when brachytherapy is not available or ineligible.

Image-guided Interstitial Brachytherapy in the Treatment of Primary and Recurrent Vulvovaginal Gynaecological Malignancies.

AIMS: To evaluate the use, outcomes and toxicities of high dose rate brachytherapy (HDRB) to the vulvovaginal region in previously irradiated and radiotherapy-naïve patients for primary or recurrent gynaecological malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2010 to December 2020, 94 women with a median age of 64 years (range 31-88 years) were treated with interstitial HDRB for vulvovaginal disease. Treatment details, including cumulative radiotherapy doses, were recorded together with reported toxicity, using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grading. Dosimetric parameters, including D90, V100 and V150 together with treatment response at 3 months, overall survival, relapse-free survival and long-term toxicity data, were collated from referring centres. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 78 months (range 2-301). Primary sites of disease included vagina (37), endometrium (29), vulva (16), ovary (7) and cervix (5). Eighty-six (91.5%) patients were treated with curative intent, eight (8.5%) were palliative treatments. Fifty patients received HDRB for recurrent disease, 39 patients for primary disease and five as part of adjuvant treatment. The anatomical site of disease treated with HDRB ranged from vagina (76), vulva (14) and peri-urethral sites (four). The 2- and 5-year local relapse-free survival rates were 76% and 72%, respectively; 15 patients experienced local failure only, whereas six patients had local and nodal/distant failure. The median time to local recurrence was 8 months (range 2-88 months). The 2- and 5-year overall survival rates for all patients were 67% and 47%, respectively; the median overall survival was 59 months. Seventy-nine (84%) patients had a complete response measured with imaging at 3 months. Grade 3 toxicity was reported in 14 patients (14.8%). CONCLUSION: This retrospective series suggests the use of interstitial brachytherapy for vulvovaginal gynaecological malignancy to be an effective and safe treatment option. Good local control was achieved with a tolerable toxicity profile; it is a valuable treatment modality.

Risk Factors and Survival Impact Associated With Documentation of Radiation Therapy Refusal in Patients With Gynecologic Cancer.

PURPOSE: Radiation therapy (RT) refusal is known to have deleterious effects on survival for multiple cancer types. Factors associated with RT refusal by patients with gynecologic malignancies have not been well described. This study aimed to examine factors associated with and the survival impact of documented RT refusal among patients with gynecologic cancers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study analyzed data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) of patients with gynecologic cancers diagnosed between 2004 and 2020. Patients were included if they had complete survival data and a documented RT recommendation by their treating physician in the NCDB. Patients coded as received RT were compared with those coded as refused RT in the NCDB using a multivariate log binomial regression with robust variance to yield incidence rate ratios (IRR). Overall survival was analyzed using a multivariate (MV) Cox proportional hazards model to yield hazard ratios. RESULTS: This study identified 209,976 patients. A total of 5.75% (n = 12,081) patients were coded as refusing RT. Multivariable IRR showed that documentation of RT refusal was positively associated with older age (MV IRR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.041-1.045), Native Hawaiian Pacific Islander race (1.72 [1.27-2.32]), and increased morbidity (score = 1: 1.06 [1.02-1.11]; score = 2: 1.20 [1.12-1.29]; score ≥3: 1.26 [1.14-1.38]). Negative associations were seen with Hispanic ethnicity (0.74 [0.67-0.80]), having insurance (0.58 [0.53-0.63]), and annual income >$74,063 (0.85 [0.81-0.90]). During the 16-year period, a statistically significant test for trend (P = .001) for increasing RT refusal was noted. RT refusal was associated with a significantly higher risk of death (MV hazard ratio, 1.59 [1.55-1.63]). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with gynecologic malignancies diagnosed from 2004 to 2020, an increase in documented RT refusal is associated with decreased overall survival in all disease types. Targeted interventions aimed at mitigating potential sociodemographic barriers to receipt of RT are warranted.

Image-guided preplanning workflow for high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for gynecological malignancies.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate image-guided preplan workflows for high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for advanced gynecological malignancies. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two different preplanning scenarios are presented: (1) CT- or MRI-based preplan with partial applicator in place; (2) Preplans generated from prior fractions. The first scenario can be applied to Syed-Neblett template-based implants or hybrid brachytherapy applicators, while the second scenario applies to hybrid applicators. Both scenarios use MRI or CT images acquired with the applicator in place to demonstrate tumor and applicator relative locations and therefore, provide the ability to show optimized suggested needle positions including the implant depths before the actual insertion. RESULTS: The preplanning techniques have demonstrated feasibility and shown five areas of potential improvement: (1) shorter procedure time, (2) decreased number of total needles inserted, (3) shorter physician tumor contour time, (4) shorter planning time, and (5) evaluation of appropriateness for brachytherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The use of image-guided brachytherapy preplanning improves clinical efficiency and is recommended for consideration for adaptation into clinical workflows for HDR interstitial and hybrid brachytherapy.

Development and clinical implementation of simple needle attachment post placement interstitial template (SNAPP-IT) enabling a shorter, more direct needle path while preserving tumor visualization.

PURPOSE: Historical gynecologic interstitial brachytherapy templates block direct tumor visualization during needle placement, presenting an opportunity for clinical innovation to develop a novel interstitial template allowing direct tumor visualization during needle insertion. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We designed and implemented a novel interstitial template, simple needle attachment post placement interstitial template (SNAPP-IT), that allowed direct visualization of the target vaginal tumor during interstitial needle placement while maintaining the ability to individually secure needles to the template, allow a vaginal cylinder, suture holes for securing to the perineum, MRI compatibility and sterilizable for repeat use. Procedure outcomes including procedure time, needle path lengths, and plan dosimetry were prospectively captured in a patient database. RESULTS: Forty gynecologic interstitial brachytherapy cases were recorded (20 SNAPP-IT, 20 traditional templates). Needle insertion depth was reduced using the SNAPP-IT in comparison with traditional interstitial templates (11.8 cm vs. 3.6 cm, p < 0.0001). The average CTV volume was 25.6 cc for SNAPP-IT and 20.7 cc for traditional; both methods averaged a similar number of needles (15.8, 15.6). Dosimetric constraints were similarly met in both treatment groups. Procedures performed using the SNAPP-IT were shorter compared with those performed with traditional interstitial devices (83.4 minutes vs. 100.7 minutes) and there were no post-operative infections in the SNAPP-IT group. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a novel gynecologic interstitial brachytherapy template (SNAPP-IT) reduced procedure times, allowed direct tumor visualization, and decreased needle insertion depth. SNAPP-IT provides a useful alternative approach for vaginal interstitial brachytherapy, may increase brachytherapist efficiency with complex procedures and potentially expands access to interstitial brachytherapy.

Ghosts in the machinery: Living with and beyond radiotherapy treatment for gynaecological cancer.

This paper explores post-treatment experiences of women who have had radiotherapy for gynaecological cancer. Drawing on data from a project which explored post-treatment wellbeing, conceptual metaphors of ghosts/haunting are used to engage with enduring legacies of cancer and 'neglected matters' in post-treatment trajectories. Current arrangements of care contribute to the idea that participants are 'out of the other side of cancer' once active treatment completes. Despite broader ambitions for holistic cancer rehabilitation, fragilities of body and mind persist, even when the outward representation is one of health, of looking well, of moving on. We show how neglected matters of cancer (visceral late effects, psychological suffering and lives not lived) are part of living with and beyond cancer. These 'ghosts' manifest in chronic states of unsettledness that are temporarily relieved by individualised 'fixes', such as mobilisation of 'mind over matter' discourse and mindfulness. This discourse and its associated tools are a powerful yet impoverished framing of approaches to living with and beyond cancer. We argue for the need to attend to 'neglected matters' of post-treatment trajectories differently.

Resting energy expenditure changes after antineoplastic treatment in gynecological cancer: a prospective pilot study / Cambios en el gasto energético en reposo tras el tratamiento antineoplásico en cáncer ginecológico: estudio piloto prospectivo

Introduction: energy metabolism in cancer patients is influenced by different factors. However, the effect of antineoplastic treatment is not clear, especially in women. Objective: to evaluate resting energy expenditure (REE) by indirect calorimetry (IC) before (T0) and after (T1) first cycle period of antineoplastic therapy: radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy (CT), and concomitant chemoradiation therapy (CRT), quality of life (QoL) and accuracy of REE were compared with international guidelines recommendations per kilogram (European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism [ESPEN]). Methods: an observational, longitudinal study was conducted in women with gynecological cancer diagnosis undergoing antineoplastic treatment: RT, CT and CRT. Weight loss, actual body weight and height were measured. REE was evaluated in T0-T1 and compared with ESPEN recommendations. Kruskal-Wallis test and Bland-Alman analysis were used to determine the agreement (± 10 % of energy predicted) of REE adjusted by physical activity (TEE) compared with ESPEN recommendations, respectively. Results: fifty-four women with cancer were included: 31.5 % (n = 17) for RT group, 31.5 % (n = 17) for CT group and 37 % (n = 20) for CRT group. REE showed statistical differences between T0 and T1 in the total population (p = 0.018), but these were not associated with anticancer therapy groups (p > 0.05). QoL had no significant changes after treatment (p > 0.05). Accuracy of 25 and 30 kcal/kg compared to TEE was less than 30 %. Conclusion: REE in women with gynecological cancer decreased after antineoplastic treatments but this is not associated with a particular antineoplastic therapy. It is needed to develop research to determine the accuracy of ESPEN recommendations with TEE estimated by IC and clinical factors in women with cancer. (AU)

Antecedentes: el metabolismo energético en pacientes con cáncer está influenciado por diferentes factores. Sin embargo, el efecto sobre el tratamiento antineoplásico no es claro, especialmente en mujeres. Objetivo: evaluar el gasto energético en reposo (GER) mediante calorimetría indirecta (CI) antes (T0) y después (T1) del primer ciclo del tratamiento antineoplásico: radioterapia (RT), quimioterapia (QT) y quimio-radioterapia concomitante (QRT), calidad de vida (CdV) y precisión del GER con las con las recomendaciones internacionales por kilogramo de peso (European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism [ESPEN]). Métodos: se realizó un estudio longitudinal, observacional en mujeres con diagnóstico de cáncer ginecológico en tratamiento antineoplásico. Se evaluó el GER en T0 y T1. Se midieron la pérdida de peso, el peso corporal y la talla. Se usaron las pruebas de Kruskal-Wallis y el análisis Bland-Altman para determinar la concordancia (± 10 % de GER) del REE ajustado por actividad física (TEE) en comparación con las recomendaciones de ESPEN. Resultados: se incluyeron 54 mujeres con cáncer; 31,5 % (n = 17) en el grupo RT, 31,5 % (n = 17) en el de QT y 37 % (n = 20) en el de QRT. GER mostró diferencias estadísticas entre T0 y T1 en la población total (p = 0,018); no se asoció con la terapia contra el cáncer (p > 0,05). La calidad de vida no tuvo cambios significativos después del tratamiento (p > 0,05). La precisión de 25 y 30 kcal/kg en comparación con TEE fue inferior al 30 %. Conclusión: el GER en mujeres con cáncer ginecológico disminuyó después del tratamiento antineoplásico, pero no se asoció a una terapia antineoplásica en particular. Es fundamental desarrollar más investigaciones que compare las recomendaciones de ESPEN y con los valores de la CI comparando más factores clínicos para ofrecer una intervención nutricional precisa (AU)

Outcomes and toxicity in re-irradiation of gynecologic cancer: Systematic review of the Italian association of radiation and clinical oncology (AIRO).

AIMS: The aim of this study was to provide a literature review on the efficacy and safety of reirradiation(re-I) of locoregional recurrences in gynecological malignancies. METHODS: A computerized literature search was performed in 4 electronic databases (1993-2020). Random-effects models and a tendency towards high heterogeneity (Cochran Q chi-square test and the I2 statistic) were used. A meta-analysis technique over single and multi-arm studies was performed to determine the pooled acute and late toxicity rate ≥ G3, locoregional control (LC), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Out of 178 articles, only 18 articles accounting for 820 patients (pts) met the inclusion criteria. Outcomes were evaluable for 522 patients. Subgroup analyses highlighted moderate to high heterogeneity among studies. BT (Brachytherapy) showed a 2y OS of 63% (95% CI, 55 to 71 p = 0,36) and 5y OS of 42% (95% CI, 35 to 50, p = 0,43) with 1y-2y-3y LC of 74 (95% CI, 62 to 75, p = 0.04)49% (95% CI, 40 to 58, p = 0.38) and 48% (95% CI, 39 to 58, p = 0,45) respectively. Chemotherapy does not improve SBRT outcomes: BT showed a G3- G4 toxicities rate was of26% (95% CI: 8-49%); studies on SBRT re-I showed a G3-G4 toxicity around of 20% if combined with CHT, and <10 when alone. CONCLUSION: A large heterogeneity among studies was revealed, but showing promising results in terms of safety and feasibility. BT resulted the best kind of radiation therapy delivery in terms of clinical outcome and comparable to the SBRT technique in terms of toxicities.

The ambivalence of radiotherapy: Re-framing effects and their temporalities in treatment for gynaecological cancer.

Within the biomedical paradigm, treatment effects are typically split into primary and secondary effects with temporality playing a key role in this separation. Yet, this kind of ordering of effects with some effects understood as happening on the 'side', secondary and temporary, does not fit with how they are experienced by many patients who undergo treatment for cancer. Drawing on empirical data from a research project that gathered narratives of women's experiences of radiotherapy for gynaecological cancer, we observe radiotherapeutic effects that are experienced as ambivalent and temporally diverse and as overlapping demands that the women endure and manage. We propose Derrida's concept of pharmakon as a relevant and useful analytic for understanding radiotherapy treatment, thus bringing into focus the ambivalent effects of radiotherapy - it is both therapeutic and toxic. Pharmakon, we argue, offers a way of disrupting the logics that govern current practices of therapeutic radiotherapy, and provides a way to re-negotiate the ordering and temporal understandings and practices of therapeutic efficacy, outcome and accountability of radiotherapy treatment - away from a temporal fragmentation of treatment effects and patients' bodily experiences to a focus on how best to support the whole patient in living with the ambivalent, temporally diverse and overlapping effects and demands of treatment.

A dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus rapid arc in gynecological malignancies: Dose beyond planning target volume, precisely 5Gy volume.

Introduction: Aim of radiotherapy is precise dose delivery with objective of achieving maximum local control and minimal toxicity by decreasing dose to organ at risk (OAR).This aim can be achieved by technologies like intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric arc therapy. However, later offers comparable or even better plan quality with shorter treatment time. It is important to note that low dose regions are also a concern due long-term risk of developing a second cancer after radiotherapy. The objective of our study is to do dosimetric comparison of IMRT vs. Rapid arc (RA) plan in gynecology cancer and specifically to assess dose beyond planning target volume (PTV), precisely 5 Gy volume. Methods: Each 20 eligible patients underwent radiotherapy planning on eclipse by both IMRT and RA plans as per institution protocols. Comparative dosimetric analysis of both plans was done by paired sample t-test. PTV metrics compared were D95%, homogenecity index (HI), and conformity index (CI). OAR dose compared were bowel V40 Gy <30%, Rectum V30 Gy <60%, Bladder V45 Gy <35%, and bilateral femur head and neck V30 Gy < 50%. Futhermore, calculated monitor units (MUs) were also compared. Finally, volume of normal tissue beyond the PTV, specifically 5 Gy volume, was compared between plans. Results: Dosimetric plan comparison showed statistically significant difference in RA and IMRT plans with improved PTV coverage and better OAR tolerance with RA plan. In addition, MU used were significantly less in RA plan, coupled with reduced V5 Gy volume. Conclusion: In sum, RA plans are dosimetrically significantly better compared to IMRT plans in gynecological malignancies in terms of PTV coverage and OAR sparing. Importantly, not only less MU used but also significantly less normal tissue V5 Gy volume is less in RA compared to IMRT plans.

Associations Between Social Determinants of Health and Psychoneurologic Symptom Clusters in Women With Gynecologic Cancers: A Longitudinal Study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the associations between social determinants of health (SDOH) and psychoneurologic symptom (PNS) clusters in women with gynecologic cancers during cancer treatment. SAMPLE & SETTING: 67 women with gynecologic cancers who received radiation therapy were assessed at baseline, six to eight weeks after treatment, and six months after treatment at oncology clinics in Georgia. METHODS & VARIABLES: Fatigue, pain, sleep disturbances, cognitive impairment, and depressive symptoms were measured to determine a PNS cluster score. Associations between SDOH and PNS cluster scores were assessed using mixed-effect models. RESULTS: Larger mean PNS cluster scores were reported in individuals with less education, lower income, and unemployment, as well as in those living in more disadvantaged neighborhoods. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Individual- and community-level SDOH and their interactions were associated with more PNS clusters. Studying SDOH at multiple levels depicts how various social disadvantages can exacerbate poor health outcomes.

The American Brachytherapy Society and Indian Brachytherapy Society consensus statement for the establishment of high-dose-rate brachytherapy programs for gynecological malignancies in low- and middle-income countries.

PURPOSE: The global cervical cancer burden is disproportionately high in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and outcomes can be governed by the accessibility of appropriate screening and treatment. High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy plays a central role in cervical cancer treatment, improving local control and overall survival. The American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) and Indian Brachytherapy Society (IBS) collaborated to provide this succinct consensus statement guiding the establishment of brachytherapy programs for gynecological malignancies in resource-limited settings. METHODS AND MATERIALS: ABS and IBS members with expertise in brachytherapy formulated this consensus statement based on their collective clinical experience in LMICs with varying levels of resources. RESULTS: The ABS and IBS strongly encourage the establishment of HDR brachytherapy programs for the treatment of gynecological malignancies. With the consideration of resource variability in LMICs, we present 15 minimum component requirements for the establishment of such programs. Guidance on these components, including discussion of what is considered to be essential and what is considered to be optimal, is provided. CONCLUSIONS: This ABS/IBS consensus statement can guide the successful and safe establishment of HDR brachytherapy programs for gynecological malignancies in LMICs with varying levels of resources.

Clinical implementation of 3D transvaginal ultrasound for intraoperative guidance of needle implant in template interstitial gynecologic high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate novel clinical implementation of a 3D transvaginal ultrasound (3DTVUS) system for intraoperative needle insertion guidance in perineal template interstitial gynecologic high-dose-rate brachytherapy and assess its impact on implant quality. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Interstitial implants began with preimplant 3DTVUS to visualize the tumor and anatomy, with intermittent 3DTVUS to assess the implant and guide needle adjustment. Analysis includes visualization of the implant relative to anatomy, identification of cases where 3DTVUS is beneficial, dosimetry, and a survey distributed to 3DTVUS clinicians. RESULTS: Seven patients treated between November 2021 and October 2022 were included in this study. Twenty needles were inserted under 3DTVUS guidance. The tumor and vaginal wall were well-differentiated in four and all seven patients, respectively. Patients with tumours below the superior aspect of the vagina are suited for 3DTVUS. Four radiation oncologists responded to the survey. There was general agreement that 3DTVUS improves implant and anatomy visualization and is preferred over standard 2D ultrasound guidance techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Based on qualitative feedback from primary users and a small preliminary patient cohort, 3DTVUS imaging improves tumor and vaginal wall visualization during gynecologic perineal template interstitial needle implant and is a powerful tool for implant assessment in an intraoperative setting.

Dosimetry and acute radiation enteritis comparison between prone and supine position in IMRT for gynecological cancers.

PURPOSE: To probe the differences of dosimetry and acute radiation enteritis between prone and supine position in gynecological cancer patients treated with intensity-modulate radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS: Gynecologic tumor patients who received IMRT from January 2020 to July 2021 were analyzed. 60 patients were enrolled and divided into the supine or prone position group according to different radiotherapy positions, including 34 patients in prone position and 26 patients in supine position. The dose-volume histogram of organs at risk (OARs) and the incidence of acute radiation enteritis were compared between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to show the clinical characteristics and dose volume metrics to the association of acute radiation enteritis. RESULTS: The percentage of volume receiving 5 Gy, 10 Gy, 15 Gy, 20 Gy, 30 Gy, 40 Gy, and 45 Gy doses for the small intestine were 79.0%, 67.4%, 59.6%, 44.3%, 17.0%, 8.9%, and 6.0%, respectively in the prone group, which were lower than those in the supine group (P < 0.05). The mean radiation dose (Dmean ) of the small intestine exposure in prone group was decreased (P < 0.001). Compared with the supine group, the prone group who suffered from acute radiation enteritis were much less. The probability of indigestion, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal pain in the prone position were 35.29%, 29.41%, 17.65%, 38.24%, and 5.88%, respectively. The differences in indigestion, nausea, and diarrhea between the two groups were statistically significant (P = 0.012, P = 0.029, and P = 0.041). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was shown that prone position was found to be protective against indigestion (P = 0.002), nausea (P = 0.013), vomiting (P = 0.035), and abdominal pain (P = 0.021). CONCLUSION: Prone position in IMRT for gynecological cancers could significantly reduce radiation dose to the small bowel and colon, which would decrease the occurrence and severity of acute intestinal side effects possibly.